The International Criminal Court Reports

The International Criminal Court or ICC is a team of judicial bodies to prosecute guilty individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war that causes chaos ad aggresion. And because it is ruled by international committee, some issues on being bias on nationalities in positions are discussed. Below are the recent news for International Criminal Court.

Visit: htpp://lawyersuae.com

Three shortlisted for International Criminal Court post

THREE SENIOR lawyers – a Finn, a Canadian and an Australian – have been shortlisted for the job of deputy chief prosecutor at the International Criminal Court (ICC) to replace Fatou Bensouda, who was promoted to chief prosecutor in June, as controversy grows over whether or not the ICC should intervene in Syria.

Read more: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2012/1002/1224324727547.html

IBA 2012: ‘No western bias at International Criminal Court’

The UN's legal counsel has rebutted allegations that the International Criminal Court (ICC) is applying 'selective justice' by concentrating its attention on Africa.

Patricia O'Brien also described as a 'misconception' claims that the US is 'in combat with' the court because it has not signed up to the decade-old institution.

O'Brien, under-secretary-general for legal affairs at the UN, oversees the organisation's 200-strong Office of Legal Affairs. She was interviewed at the IBA conference in Dublin today, where debate focused on the UN's inaction in Syria and the allegedly pro-western bias of the ICC.

Visit: http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/iba-2012-no-western-bias-international-crimi...

Connect with me on Google+

The International Criminal Court Reports

The International Criminal Court or ICC is a team of judicial bodies to prosecute guilty individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war that causes chaos ad aggresion. And because it is ruled by international committee, some issues on being bias on nationalities in positions are discussed. Below are the recent news for International Criminal Court.

Visit: htpp://lawyersuae.com

Three shortlisted for International Criminal Court post

THREE SENIOR lawyers – a Finn, a Canadian and an Australian – have been shortlisted for the job of deputy chief prosecutor at the International Criminal Court (ICC) to replace Fatou Bensouda, who was promoted to chief prosecutor in June, as controversy grows over whether or not the ICC should intervene in Syria.

Read more: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2012/1002/1224324727547.html

IBA 2012: ‘No western bias at International Criminal Court’

The UN's legal counsel has rebutted allegations that the International Criminal Court (ICC) is applying 'selective justice' by concentrating its attention on Africa.

Patricia O'Brien also described as a 'misconception' claims that the US is 'in combat with' the court because it has not signed up to the decade-old institution.

O'Brien, under-secretary-general for legal affairs at the UN, oversees the organisation's 200-strong Office of Legal Affairs. She was interviewed at the IBA conference in Dublin today, where debate focused on the UN's inaction in Syria and the allegedly pro-western bias of the ICC.

Visit: http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/iba-2012-no-western-bias-international-crimi...

Connect with me on Google+

The International Criminal Court Reports

The International Criminal Court or ICC is a team of judicial bodies to prosecute guilty individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war that causes chaos ad aggresion. And because it is ruled by international committee, some issues on being bias on nationalities in positions are discussed. Below are the recent news for International Criminal Court.

Visit: htpp://lawyersuae.com

Three shortlisted for International Criminal Court post

THREE SENIOR lawyers – a Finn, a Canadian and an Australian – have been shortlisted for the job of deputy chief prosecutor at the International Criminal Court (ICC) to replace Fatou Bensouda, who was promoted to chief prosecutor in June, as controversy grows over whether or not the ICC should intervene in Syria.

Read more: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2012/1002/1224324727547.html

IBA 2012: ‘No western bias at International Criminal Court’

The UN's legal counsel has rebutted allegations that the International Criminal Court (ICC) is applying 'selective justice' by concentrating its attention on Africa.

Patricia O'Brien also described as a 'misconception' claims that the US is 'in combat with' the court because it has not signed up to the decade-old institution.

O'Brien, under-secretary-general for legal affairs at the UN, oversees the organisation's 200-strong Office of Legal Affairs. She was interviewed at the IBA conference in Dublin today, where debate focused on the UN's inaction in Syria and the allegedly pro-western bias of the ICC.

Visit: http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/iba-2012-no-western-bias-international-crimi...

Connect with me on Google+

The International Criminal Court Reports

The International Criminal Court or ICC is a team of judicial bodies to prosecute guilty individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war that causes chaos ad aggresion. And because it is ruled by international committee, some issues on being bias on nationalities in positions are discussed. Below are the recent news for International Criminal Court.

Visit: htpp://lawyersuae.com

Three shortlisted for International Criminal Court post

THREE SENIOR lawyers – a Finn, a Canadian and an Australian – have been shortlisted for the job of deputy chief prosecutor at the International Criminal Court (ICC) to replace Fatou Bensouda, who was promoted to chief prosecutor in June, as controversy grows over whether or not the ICC should intervene in Syria.

Read more: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2012/1002/1224324727547.html

IBA 2012: ‘No western bias at International Criminal Court’

The UN's legal counsel has rebutted allegations that the International Criminal Court (ICC) is applying 'selective justice' by concentrating its attention on Africa.

Patricia O'Brien also described as a 'misconception' claims that the US is 'in combat with' the court because it has not signed up to the decade-old institution.

O'Brien, under-secretary-general for legal affairs at the UN, oversees the organisation's 200-strong Office of Legal Affairs. She was interviewed at the IBA conference in Dublin today, where debate focused on the UN's inaction in Syria and the allegedly pro-western bias of the ICC.

Visit: http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/iba-2012-no-western-bias-international-crimi...

Connect with me on Google+

Types of Criminal Law Cases

Criminal law is a branch of law that covers all offenses and crimes committed by an individual against the state. Its purpose is to clearly put a borderline of what is considered unacceptable to the state and society. This is well defined as the rule sets aside the conducts that are allowed and tolerable from those that threatens, endangers and harms the people. Criminal law also emphasizes on the punishments the offended must face. However, criminal cases must be clearly defined against civil ...

The Laws and Court Cases on Voting Rights

In any country, there are laws and court cases on the rights of the voters. The laws are made to protect the minority through advocacy and litigation. Read along on the recent issues on voting rights around the globe to learn and to educate everyone on racial discrimination court cases.

Get a Good Advice from a Respected Lawyer here.


Voting rights cases: Made simple

Nearly a half-century ago, Congress decided that the government could not end racial discrimination in voting simply by suing one state, county, or city at a time, because officials who were determined to keep minorities away from the polls were quickly shifting to new tactics. The only way to keep ahead of those tactics, Congress decided, was to bar the worst offenders among state and local governments from adopting any new election laws until they had first proved they would not discriminate. That was a massive shift in policy, and it worked: the law that Congress passed in 1965, the Voting Rights Act, is now widely credited as the most effective civil rights law in American history; even the Supreme Court has said so.

Learn more about the Recent Voting Rights.


A Tight Election May Be Tangled in Legal Battles

The November presidential election, widely expected to rest on a final blitz of advertising and furious campaigning, may also hinge nearly as much on last-minute legal battles over when and how ballots should be cast and counted, particularly if the race remains tight in battleground states.

In the last few weeks, nearly a dozen decisions in federal and state courts on early voting, provisional ballots and voter identification requirements have driven the rules in conflicting directions, some favoring Republicans demanding that voters show more identification to guard against fraud and others backing Democrats who want to make voting as easy as possible.

Read the News on Legal Battles...


Court Cases Continue to Decide the Future of Voting Rights

The ballots cast on Election Day will decide Congressional seats and the next president—and in some states, those votes will also decide major constitutional and legislative measures. While the battles over early voting and voter ID continue, other states are focusing in on propositions that are sometimes as important as life and death. Here are some of this week’s voting rights updates.

South Los Angeles Voters Crucial to Upcoming Election

Fewer than half of the states allow for citizens to initiate constitutional amendments, laws or statues—and twenty-five allow for citizens to overturn state statutes through veto referendums. California allows for all of these, and has passed and vetoed some of the most controversial legislation in the country. This fall, California voters will decide whether to make crucial changes to the state’s “three strikes” law, and whether to abolish the death penalty.

More voting rights updates here : Court Cases...


Choose the Best Lawyer for Court Cases here.

Connect with me on Google+

When to Hire a Workers Compensation Lawyer

Each and everyone of use deserves a good treatment whenever we are in our workplace. However if we have been deprived from our rights as a worker in our workplace then we can consult come Workers Compensation Lawyers. Below is the definition of a Workers Compensation Lawyer and an example of a case that Lawyers handle for the rights of workers.

Hire only the Best Workers Compensation Lawyers.


Worker’s Compensation Lawyer

Before giving a short definition of the worker compensation lawyer let us define what is meant by worker’s compensation.

What is worker’s compensation?

Worker’s compensation is an insurance paid by the employer of the firm to the workers in the form of financial benefits and medical care for the workers who fall sick or are injured while performing their job in the firm.

Who is the lawyer handling the worker’s compensation law suits?

A lawyer dealing with the worker’s compensation law suits is a lawyer who works on behalf of the employee claimant providing client advocacy during legal happenings.

Natsir Hussain

The Significance of the Worker’s Compensation Lawyers

Mishaps and accidents can happen to any person anytime and it could happen in your workplace. A worker may meet an accident while doing his task and the worker can ask compensation from the company or firm. The assistance depends on the type of injury suffered by the worker in te workplace. The worker can ask a heavy claim from the firm if the case of the injury left him impaired or permanently disabled. The medical expenses will also be shouldered by the company of the worker even if the injury...

The Laws and Court Cases on Voters\' Rights

In any country, there are laws and court cases on the rights of the voters. The laws are made to protect the minority through advocacy and litigation. Read along on the recent issues on voting rights around the globe to learn and to educate everyone on racial discrimination court cases.

Get a Good Advice from a Respected Lawyer here.


Voting rights cases: Made simple

Nearly a half-century ago, Congress decided that the government could not end racial discrimination in voting simply by suing one state, county, or city at a time, because officials who were determined to keep minorities away from the polls were quickly shifting to new tactics. The only way to keep ahead of those tactics, Congress decided, was to bar the worst offenders among state and local governments from adopting any new election laws until they had first proved they would not discriminate. That was a massive shift in policy, and it worked: the law that Congress passed in 1965, the Voting Rights Act, is now widely credited as the most effective civil rights law in American history; even the Supreme Court has said so.

Learn more about the Recent Voting Rights.


A Tight Election May Be Tangled in Legal Battles

The November presidential election, widely expected to rest on a final blitz of advertising and furious campaigning, may also hinge nearly as much on last-minute legal battles over when and how ballots should be cast and counted, particularly if the race remains tight in battleground states.

In the last few weeks, nearly a dozen decisions in federal and state courts on early voting, provisional ballots and voter identification requirements have driven the rules in conflicting directions, some favoring Republicans demanding that voters show more identification to guard against fraud and others backing Democrats who want to make voting as easy as possible.

Read the News on Legal Battles...


Court Cases Continue to Decide the Future of Voting Rights

The ballots cast on Election Day will decide Congressional seats and the next president—and in some states, those votes will also decide major constitutional and legislative measures. While the battles over early voting and voter ID continue, other states are focusing in on propositions that are sometimes as important as life and death. Here are some of this week’s voting rights updates.

South Los Angeles Voters Crucial to Upcoming Election

Fewer than half of the states allow for citizens to initiate constitutional amendments, laws or statues—and twenty-five allow for citizens to overturn state statutes through veto referendums. California allows for all of these, and has passed and vetoed some of the most controversial legislation in the country. This fall, California voters will decide whether to make crucial changes to the state’s “three strikes” law, and whether to abolish the death penalty.

More voting rights updates here : Court Cases...


Choose the Best Lawyer for Court Cases here.

Connect with me on Google+

Get Free Consultation from Lawyers

Consultations from lawyers are more likely interviews, where you discuss with your lawyer your complaint or case and the lawyers give advices on how to fix it. Seeing a lawyer for an advice can be costly. Normally, clients will see two or three lawyers to seek for options and opinions which can be very expensive. Lawyers sometimes waive consultation fees. Free consultations will allow you feel and weigh which lawyer is best fitted to handle your case. Here are certain ways to get free consu...